A FEDERAL JUDGE HAS ISSUED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDERS BANNING RACIAL PROFILING AND REQUIRING LEGAL ACCESS

A FEDERAL JUDGE HAS ISSUED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDERS BANNING RACIAL PROFILING AND REQUIRING LEGAL ACCESS #america #usa #immigration

A federal judge has since issued temporary restraining orders banning racial profiling and requiring legal access, citing Fourth and Fifth Amendment violations. What the Judge Did A federal judge—Maame EwusiMensah Frimpong—recently issued two temporary restraining orders in response to reports of harsh immigration enforcement tactics by ICE and DHS agents in Southern California The Daily Beast+2KTVU FOX 2 San Francisco+2The Washington Post+2Reason.com+15Reuters+15The Wall Street Journal+15. The court ruling addressed multiple constitutional concerns by: Banning racial profiling: Agents can no longer make stops or arrests based solely on race, ethnicity (e.g., being Latino), language (e.g., speaking Spanish or having an accent), where a person works (such as farms, car washes, or daylabor sites), or where they are found (like bus stops) KTVU FOX 2 San Francisco+4The Wall Street Journal+4Oregon Department of Justice+4. Requiring legal access: Detainees must now have daily access to counsel and confidential communications, meaning legal phone calls and meetings cannot be withheld . Constitutional Foundation The judge emphasized that these ICE tactics likely violated: Fourth Amendment: Protects against unreasonable searches and seizures—i.e., the “roving patrols” or suspicionless stops were unconstitutional Reuters+15The Wall Street Journal+15Davis Vanguard+15. Fifth Amendment: Includes due-process rights—detainees must be allowed legal counsel and cannot be denied basic legal protections Reuters+4The Wall Street Journal+4The Washington Post+4. Why This Matters Major legal check: The court blocked sweeping immigration enforcement in at least seven Southern California counties, including LA County Davis Vanguard+12AP News+12New York Post+12. Nationwide impact: While focused on California, this ruling sets an important precedent against racially based immigration enforcement elsewhere in the U.S. Public reaction: Civil rights groups praised the ruling, while DHS and ICE continue to push back; DHS argues their actions were lawful and race-neutral. Bottom line: The court froze certain ICE tactics—no more detaining people based on race, language, appearance, work, or location, and detainees must have daily legal access. This represents a significant judicial rebuke to aggressive immigration enforcement in Southern California.

OGMEN LAW FIRM CONTACTS – İLETİŞİM BİLGİLERİ – CONTACTOS:

ADDRESS: 26 Broadway, 3rd Floor, NY, NY 10004, USA

Phone: +1 (212) 245-70 70

Fax: +1 (877) 513-83 39

E-mail: [email protected]

LİNKLER – LINKS – ENLACES:

https://ogmenlaw.com https://www.youtube.com/c/OgmenLawFirm

https://www.facebook.com/ayhanogmenn

https://www.facebook.com/attorneyayhanogmen

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Avukat-Ayhan-Ogmen/923874061006633

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Abogado-Ayhan-Ogmen/1467463383569608

X / Twitter: Av_Ayhan_Ogmen

X / Twitter: OgmenLaw

https://instagram.com/avukatayhanogmen/

https://instagram.com/ogmenlaw/

https://www.linkedin.com/in/ayhanogmen

https://vimeo.com/user42035567

https://vimeo.com/user42029975

http://www.dailymotion.com/ayhanogmen

http://www.dailymotion.com/aogmen1

OTHER IMPORTANT LINKS – DİĞER ÖNEMLİ LİNKLER – OTROS ENLACES IMPORTANTES:

https://www.usa.gov

https://www.house.gov

http://www.senate.gov

https://www.uscis.gov